Every CFO's nightmare: the sales team wants lower prices to close deals, while the board demands margin improvement.
Meanwhile, competitors are dropping prices faster than crypto in a bear market, and your pricing strategy feels like bringing a knife to a gunfight.
Welcome to the brutal reality of competitive pricing, where following the market can lead you straight off a cliff, but ignoring it might leave you irrelevant.
Competitive pricing means setting your prices based on what others in the market charge.
That means you're not setting prices on what it costs you to deliver products, or what customers might pay, but on what your competition is doing.
It's pricing by peer pressure, and like most peer pressure situations, it can lead to spectacularly bad decisions.
Compare this to its cousins:
The Analytical Cousin:
Cost-plus pricing (your costs + markup = price) - reliable, methodical, always shows their work. Treats every business decision like a spreadsheet problem, but sometimes misses the extra context.
The Psychological Cousin:
Value-based pricing (what customers will pay) - intuitive about people, but requires reading the room perfectly. Confident when they know the audience, lost when they don't.
The Follower Cousin:
Competitive pricing - the one who always asks, "What's everyone else doing?" Safe, agreeable, but tends to end up in trouble when the crowd heads toward a cliff.
You'll see it everywhere: gas stations matching prices within pennies, SaaS companies clustering around magic numbers like $99/month, and retailers playing the endless Black Friday game.
It's most common in
The logic seems bulletproof: price competitively, win customers, profit. Reality? More like: price competitively, trigger price war, wonder where margins went.
Market entry becomes almost friction-free. Launch at 10% below the competition? Instant attention. Customers in price-sensitive segments notice immediately - nothing says "give us a shot" like undercutting the competition.
Building momentum in saturated markets suddenly seems possible. When everyone charges $100, coming in at $89 turns heads. Early adopters jump ship, case studies accumulate, and suddenly you're the disruptor everyone's discussing.
No complex value calculations, no customer willingness-to-pay studies - just check competitor websites and price accordingly.
Customer acquisition accelerates in predictable ways. Price-conscious buyers respond to clear savings. The sales cycle shortens when price objections evaporate. Marketing messages write themselves: "Same service, better price."
Price wars destroy entire industries. Remember when airlines competed on price alone? Now they charge for every little thing. What was once a luxury industry has become a commodity where comfort costs extra, and basic service feels like a favor. Once you start the race to the bottom, finding the exit becomes impossible.
Margin compression happens faster than sales growth. Sure, revenue looks great on the hockey stick chart, but when gross margins drop from 70% to 30%, that growth feels pyrrhic. Volume rarely compensates for gutted unit economics.
Value perception erodes insidiously. Customers start equating a lower price with lower quality. Premium positioning becomes impossible. Your brand transforms from "innovative solution" to "budget alternative."
Customer loyalty evaporates when price is your only differentiator. The moment someone undercuts you, those hard-won customers vanish. You've trained them to shop on price alone - surprise when they do exactly that.
Innovation investment becomes impossible. R&D needs a margin. Customer success requires resources. Product development demands funding. When you're racing to the bottom on price, these become luxuries you can't afford.
Picture two project management platforms: established TechGiant at $99/month per user, and hungry startup DisruptorCo.
DisruptorCo launches at $89/month, grabbing headlines and early adopters. Sales quotes become simple: "We do everything TechGiant does, for less." Customer acquisition costs plummet. Growth charts go vertical.
Year one looks spectacular. Year two? Problems emerge.
TechGiant responds, dropping to $79/month. DisruptorCo matches. Support tickets pile up, but hiring freezes prevent adequate staffing. Product development slows. Customer churn accelerates as service quality drops.
By year three, DisruptorCo faces a choice: raise prices and lose price-sensitive customers, or maintain prices and burn cash. They try option three - bundling features and selling "premium" support. Customers see through it. The death spiral accelerates.
SmartCo took a different approach in the same market. They launched at $79/month to build their user base, then systematically added enterprise features, advanced analytics, and priority support. After 18 months, they successfully migrated 60% of customers to their $119/month "Pro" tier by demonstrating clear value. The temporary undercut became a customer acquisition strategy, not a permanent position.
Meanwhile, ValueCo entered the same market at $149/month, focusing on enterprise features and white-glove service. They captured 5% market share to DisruptorCo's 15%, but at 3x the margin. Guess who's still in business?
Sometimes - emphasis on sometimes - competitive pricing actually works:
When customers can instantly compare identical products, price matters. Think wholesale fuel, basic web hosting, or standardized financial products. Differentiation is minimal, switching costs are low, and price rules.
New entrants need footholds. Competitive pricing provides one. The key? Having an exit strategy. Use competitive pricing to build a customer base and brand recognition, then migrate toward value-based pricing.
Entering new markets often requires price sensitivity. Local competitors have home-field advantages (like may be the case due to tariffs). Competitive pricing levels the playing field while you establish operations and relationships.
In commodity-like markets where offerings are essentially identical, customers default to price comparisons. When your product looks, feels, and performs exactly like competitors', competitive pricing becomes the logical differentiator rather than fighting an uphill battle on features that don't exist.
More often, competitive pricing becomes a trap:
Luxury brands don't compete on price. Neither should B2B companies target enterprise clients. When Rolls-Royce starts price-matching Toyota, something went wrong. Plus, as mentioned above, severely undercutting the price can lead to your brand being viewed as second-tier, no matter how high-quality your product or service.
If you spend $1,000 acquiring customers yielding $50 monthly gross margin, competitive pricing extends payback periods toward infinity. SaaS companies with enterprise sales motions can't afford price wars.
Complex, consultative sales processes with months of customization mean price becomes one factor among many. Competing solely on price ignores relationship value, implementation complexity, and switching costs. It can be the one thing to run your business down, as seen in the example with DisruptorCo.
Mission-critical services prioritize reliability over savings. Nobody wants the cheapest heart surgeon or pacemaker device. When failure isn't an option, customers pay for confidence, not discounts.
Smart pricing requires discipline and data, not just following the competition off a cliff:
Not all customers value price equally.
Price discrimination isn't illegal—it's strategic. Build pricing tiers that reflect these realities.
Beyond obvious costs lurk hidden expenses that destroy margins: customer support calls, infrastructure scaling, compliance requirements, and those "quick customizations" that turn into months-long projects. Model true unit economics before you even think about matching competitor prices.
Markets change. Competitors adjust. Customer needs evolve. Build pricing systems that allow rapid adjustments without operational chaos—because nothing says "amateur hour" like manually updating hundreds of contracts every time a competitor drops their rates.
Here's the uncomfortable truth: Competitive pricing should be temporary. Plan the migration toward sustainable pricing models from day one. How will you move customers up-market? When will you adjust? What triggers the shift from follower to leader?
We build pricing strategies aligned to growth goals, not just market trends. While competitors play follow-the-leader, smart businesses work with experienced finance professionals to develop pricing that serves long-term objectives.
Our fractional CFO services include competitive positioning analysis, profitability modeling, and go-to-market input that turns pricing into a strategic advantage rather than a tactical reaction. Because the best pricing strategy isn't about matching—it's about winning.
Competitive pricing isn't about being the cheapest—it's about being strategic. The companies that win don't just match prices; they understand when to follow, when to lead, and when to walk away entirely.
Smart businesses set prices that support growth, not just sales. They use pricing to gain footholds, then build differentiation that makes price comparisons irrelevant. Because at the end of the day, customers don't buy price—they buy solutions to problems.
The race to the bottom has only one winner, and it's usually bankruptcy court. Build pricing that supports your vision, not your competitors' limitations.
Want to pressure test your pricing strategy before your next competitor forces your hand?
Let's build a model that protects your margins while positioning you to win.
Click here to talk to a McCracken Alliance CFO today because, in our experience, the best competitive strategy isn't matching prices, it's making price irrelevant through superior value delivery.
Competitive pricing means setting your prices based on what competitors charge rather than your costs or customer value perception.
Cost-plus pricing adds a markup to your costs, value-based pricing charges what customers will pay, while competitive pricing follows market rates regardless of your costs or value delivered.
Use it in commodity markets or when entering new territories; avoid it when you have differentiated products, high acquisition costs, or premium positioning.
Pricing too low can trigger price wars, erode perceived value, compress margins, and make innovation investment impossible.
Competitive pricing can help gain market share initially but may hurt long-term profitability if it prevents differentiation and reduces funds available for growth investments.
McCracken Alliance helps companies model pricing scenarios, establish margin guardrails, and develop strategies that balance competitive positioning with profitable growth.
.svg)
.svg){kind=icon}